Lundgren, R; Kyrö, R and Olander, S (2024) The lifecycle impact and value capture of circular business models in the built environment. Construction Management and Economics, 42(6), pp. 527-544. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Circular economy (CE) has been of utmost interest in the industry and research community in the preceding years. However, CE is still a nascent research field in the built environment context. As technological advances within CE are slowing, the incorporation of business models into the concept is deemed important to achieve the necessary transition. Circular business models within the built environment should take a holistic perspective and a lifecycle optimization approach. The research aim is twofold, firstly, we aim to contribute to the assessment of impacts of CE business models. Secondly, we aim to establish how real estate development organizations can optimize value capture from adaptive reuse projects. We engage in an in-depth mixed methods case study assessing and comparing two adaptation scopes of a former textile factory to offices. The minor scope includes basic measures to bring the building up to standard, whilst the major scope includes the same, with the addition of space efficiency measures, extended building services, onsite energy production and various circular activities. We find that the major scope consequently captures more of the identified value propositions of the organization than the minor scope. We conclude that more circular activities do not necessarily lead to better environmental performance, however, may lead to higher profit and social gain. The study contributes to existing knowledge of impact assessments, and highlights the complexity of balancing environmental, social and economic impact in the built environment context. The assessment framework may be used by real estate developers prior to investments decisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse; circular economy; sharing economy; lifecycle assessment; lifecycle profit |
| Index terms: | complexity, impact assessment, economic impact, real estate development, value capture, profit, built environment, business model, lifecycle, real estate, circular economy, adaptation, adaptive reuse, case study, mixed method, onsite, building service, efficiency, environmental performance |
| Subjects: | performance management, economic development, sustainability assessment, sustainable design, building construction, financial analysis, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, business, user focus, data collection methods, business models, value management, engineering systems, real estate economics, project delivery, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here