Uncertainty network modeling method for construction risk management

Nyqvist, R; Peltokorpi, A and Seppänen, O (2024) Uncertainty network modeling method for construction risk management. Construction Management and Economics, 42(4), pp. 346-365. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

In recent decades, uncertainty management has increasingly elicited attention in construction management research due to increasing project complexity. However, existing management methods have not been able to solve the issues around risk and uncertainty, and regardless of the proposed network-based risk modeling approaches, there are insufficiencies in contemporary methods, such as their practical applicability. This study examined the current state and issues of uncertainty and risk management and proposed a novel uncertainty network model (UNM) as a solution. The uncertainty network model was designed and validated using design science methodology (DSM), drawing on literature and empirical data from interviews, questionnaires, case observations, and case testing. The UNM visually presents project risks, uncertainties, and their interconnections and criticality transforming project stakeholders' tacit knowledge into an explicit, systematic representation of a project’s uncertainty and risk architecture. Applied to a real-world construction project, the model received positive feedback, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing practitioners' understanding of networked risks and the potential to guide cost-effective risk-control activities by applying a systemic lens to project management. This practical validation showcases the model’s potential in addressing the shortcomings of existing methods and improving construction project risk management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: uncertainty; risk management; project management; networks; modeling; visual management; collaboration; complexity; systems thinking
Index terms: interview, systems thinking, management research, drawing, science, collaboration, construction project, methodology, management method, validation, questionnaire, practitioner, project stakeholder, network modelling, tacit knowledge, project complexity, complexity, visual management, uncertainty management, risk management, effectiveness, modelling, testing, project management
Subjects: analytical methods, professional practice, technical documentation, practitioner, specialized education, research design and methodology, risk assessment, data collection methods, systems engineering, sociology, networking, project management theory and practice, professional development, organizational theory, production management, performance management, research methods, management
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Education, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here