The slow implementation of sustainable innovations in the asphalt paving sector: the role of actors and their interactions

Ruiz, A; Vinke-De Kruijf, J; Santos, J; Keijzer, E; Volker, L and Dorée, A (2024) The slow implementation of sustainable innovations in the asphalt paving sector: the role of actors and their interactions. Construction Management and Economics, 42(10), pp. 902-925. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

International climate agreements and government policies, push the road construction industry towards more sustainable practices using alternative materials, new production techniques, and more efficient construction processes. Despite the broad availability of these sustainable solutions, their adoption is slow and uncertain. The reasons behind this remain unclear. This study employs a system innovation perspective to analyze the process that leads to the implementation of sustainable innovations in the Dutch asphalt paving sector. By exploring actors' roles and their interactions at different stages of the process, we aim to identify key aspects influencing the pace and outcome of the innovation implementation process in the industry. The results highlight that (1) the asphalt paving sector is anchored in a project perspective that often overlooks long-term sustainability goals, (2) several key innovation roles are not fully fulfilled, and the absence of a coordinating role is leading to misunderstandings, and (3) monitoring at both the project and sector levels is lacking; there is no holistic assessment of the overall impact of innovations. Overall, the findings suggest that sustainable innovation processes in Dutch asphalt paving remain confined to the niche level, which can be overcome by redistributing actors' responsibilities, addressing the lack of system monitoring, and overcoming the project perspective could help address the challenges in the process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: actor’s roles; asphalt paving; multi-actor perspective; multi-level perspective; sustainability; system innovation
Index terms: alternative material, sustainable practice, interaction, implementation, agreements, monitoring, government policy, road construction, paving, construction process
Subjects: behavioral psychology, transportation engineering, building construction, sustainable practices, civil engineering, contractual arrangements, contract formation, public policy, materials science, control systems
Topics: Contract Administration, Site Management, Sustainability, Governance, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here