Rationality and information advantage of the Japanese government’s construction forecasts over economic development

Tsuchiya, Y (2024) Rationality and information advantage of the Japanese government’s construction forecasts over economic development. Construction Management and Economics, 42(8), pp. 671-694. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This study examines the rationality of Japanese government construction forecasts between 1960 and 2019 and investigates whether the construction forecasts have an information advantage over other government’s forecasts using a recently developed test under instabilities in forecasting environments. The Japanese government construction forecasts broadly served as a reliable benchmark for most of the economic development process until the 1990s. This finding suggests that those construction forecasts contributed to effective and careful resource allocation planning in the construction and related industries and to the Japanese economy’s post-war growth. There were, however, a few irrational construction forecasts after 2000, indicating that recent construction forecasts can be improved by incorporating information from the government’s macroeconomic forecasts. The results indicate that misleading results demonstrating that all forecasts were rational were obtained if relying on the standard rationality test. These findings also suggest that governmental agencies in various countries may benefit from publishing construction forecasts because those forecasts would contribute to promoting sustainable development and growth in construction industry, not only in advanced but also developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: economic growth; forecast evaluation; government forecasts; rationality
Index terms: sustainable development, rationality, developing country, economic development, agency, forecasting, resource allocation, economic growth, construction industry, war
Subjects: sociology, industry analysis, economic development, decision-making and reasoning, health safety and environment, conflict and crisis studies, development economics, resource management, prediction and forecasting
Topics: Site Management, Legal Issues, International Construction, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here