Khabir, S and Vakilinezhad, R (2023) Energy and thermal analysis of DSF in the retrofit design of office buildings in hot climates. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(6), pp. 642-664. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
In recent decades, the energy retrofit design of buildings has been one of the most effective methods to achieve high-performance buildings. The government office buildings in Iran account for 15% of the non-residential building sector; hence, energy retrofitting of existing office buildings could effectively reduce total energy consumption and Carbon dioxide emissions. This study aims to evaluate the effect of various facade systems with cool materials on the thermal behavior and energy performance of a typical existing office building in a hot climate. The proposed hybrid retrofit method combines design and energy retrofit strategies while evaluating the effects of different workspace layouts and facade systems on external surface temperatures and total energy consumption. Applying such a method, the most optimal design and energy retrofit strategies were selected using a combination of optimization and scenario-based approaches. The results showed that using double-skin facades could reduce annual energy consumption and Carbon dioxide emissions by 63%. Moreover, the results indicated the most efficient types of cool coatings materials for reducing cooling loads.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cool materials; design strategies; energy retrofit strategies; façade system; hot climate; hybrid method; thermal analysis |
| Index terms: | non-residential building, office building, design strategy, workspace, hot climate, energy retrofitting, thermal analysis, retrofit strategy, carbon dioxide emission, surface temperature, energy performance, design of building, energy consumption, coating |
| Subjects: | climate science, design methods, energy systems, renovation and retrofit, management, design practice, thermal systems, construction type, environmental engineering, building materials, building design |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here