Hegazy, T and Moselhi, O (1994) Estimator: A prototype of an integrated bid preparation system. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 1(1), pp. 51-67. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Compiling bid proposals for construction projects is a process that depends on extensive computation as well as on experience-based judgement. Despite the proliferation of estimating tools, bid proposals focus primarily on the computational component and leave the more difficult aspects of risk assessment and mark-up estimation to estimators' judgement. This may lead to unrealistic estimates that do not account for the operational environment of projects. Such estimates often result in either losing bids or inflicting undesirable cost overruns. In an effort to circumvent such drawbacks, this paper presents a structured system for cost estimation and bid preparation. Unlike current tools, the proposed system supports a holistic bid-preparation process, accounting for a number of quantitative as well as qualitative factors that are used in practice for bid preparation. The system incorporates three principal features: 1 Integrated cost and schedule computation 2 Adequate risk assessment and mark-up estimation 3 Optimum bid unbalancing and cash flow optimization. The developments made in the integrated system are described along with a PC-based prototype Estimator, developed to automate the process. An example application is presented to illustrate the capabilities and essential features of the prototype and demonstrate its practicality.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bid preparation; bidding strategy; computer application; cost estimating |
| Index terms: | estimate, qualitative factor, integrated system, risk assessment, computer application, cost overrun, estimation, accounting, bidding, estimating, bid preparation, construction project, computation, estimator, prototype, strategy, proposal, cash flow, mark-up, cost estimating |
| Subjects: | management, financial management, software systems, production management, financial risk, price determination, profession, computational methods, design methods, modelling and simulation, bidding, project planning, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here