Lu, H and Juan, Y K (2023) Applying the DQI-based kano model and QFD to develop design strategies for visitor centers in national parks. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(3), pp. 215-232. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
China in recent years has been actively promoting the policy of establishing national parks to preserve nature systems. Visitor center (VC) is one of the most important infrastructures for protection, education, and recreation purposes in national parks. However, the current design of VCs in China is mostly based on the subjective considerations of designers and lacks in-depth discussion on the requirements of visitors. This study employed the Kano Two-Dimensional Quality method to investigate the design requirements of visitors and experts and then applied the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method to transform the requirements into design strategies. Based on these design strategies, the design of VC in a national park in southeast China was taken as an example, and two design teams were used to verify the architectural scheme design and obtain feedback from visitors through a questionnaire survey. The research results show that the design strategies proposed by this study can better meet the expectations and satisfaction of the public. In the future, it is suggested that more parties, such as national park managers and community residents, should be involved in the study to obtain better planning and design strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design strategies; kano model; national park; quality function deployment; visitor center |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, quality function deployment, China, manager, design strategy, satisfaction, design team, survey, designer |
| Subjects: | Geography, quality assurance, profession, data collection methods, design methods, practitioner, project delivery, professional practice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here