Broome, J C and Perry, J G (1995) Experiences of the use of the New Engineering Contract. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2(4), pp. 271-285. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
This paper examines the early experiences of the use of the New Engineering Contract (NEC) based on research at the University of Birmingham. It starts with a brief description of the research methodology before giving an overview of the extent of use of NEC, both in the UK and overseas, and the choices of contract strategy options which have been made. The third and main part of the paper concerns the experiences of the contract in use. The impact of the NEC on contract preparation is assessed followed by a review of the effectiveness of the new contract procedures and their implications. The changes in the roles and staffing that are required in the NEC are then considered and this leads to a discussion of the changes in culture and attitude which are stimulated by NEC. An emphasis has been put on the practical issues which a new user of the NEC will need to consider. Before concluding, the paper briefly presents the findings on whether the NEC is achieving its aims of improved clarity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contract conditions; contract administration; New Engineering Contract |
| Index terms: | contract administration, contract condition, New Engineering Contract, research methodology, effectiveness, option, Birmingham, contract preparation, contract strategy |
| Subjects: | Geography, contract management, contract structure, performance management, decision analysis, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Procurement, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here