The current status of environmental management systems in construction

Griffith, A (1995) The current status of environmental management systems in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2(1), pp. 3-16. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Many organizations within the construction industry are becoming increasingly aware of the growing need for improved environmental performance within the scope of their business activities. Their interests are twofold, first in anticipation of increasingly stringent governmental legislation, both national and international, and second in response to the rising concern demonstrated by the general public for environmental issues. To meet increasing future expectations, a number of organizations within construction have implemented or are considering the development of a formal and structured environmental management system. This paper examines some of the principal issues associated with the development of environmental management systems within construction. Drawing upon a series of interviews with major construction clients, consultants and contracting organizations within the UK, investigation identifies the present level of awareness, raises current concerns and issues and looks at the likely future orientation of environmental management systems within the construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental management system; organization
Index terms: contracting organization, legislation, interview, environmental management system, environmental issue, drawing, investigation, construction industry, environmental performance, becoming, construction client
Subjects: data collection methods, control systems, practitioner, environmental issues, technical documentation, legal systems, sustainability assessment, philosophical process, industry analysis
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here