Hyde, R (1995) Buildability as a design concept for architects: A case study of laboratory buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2(1), pp. 45-56. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
The concept of buildability is an approach to architectural design which relates to the awareness of the designer for the method of construction of the building. It is the taking into consideration of the process of construction to a high degree in the construction of the building. The opposite of this approach could be loosely called an artistic' method, where the designer hands a concept drawing to somebody else and says build that', with little concern for how the design should be built (definition contributed by James Harrison, Senior Lecturer, Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore). In addition to this design orientation, buildability, as viewed by the building industry, is the ease with which the building can be built. Yet these definitions seem to lack precision when placed into operation in the design environment. To understand the notion of buildability further, a study of concrete construction techniques, pre-cast or in situ, were used to evaluate the extent to which buildability techniques were employed by the designers and the effectiveness of the approaches. The methodology used followed existing approaches to studying buildability but expanded and focused on two case study buildings. In this way, a more holistic picture of the influence of the construction system and its buildability could be gained.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural design; buildability; laboratory |
| Index terms: | designer, case study, Singapore, architect, effectiveness, building industry, in-situ, drawing, buildability, laboratory, architectural design, construction system, methodology, concrete construction |
| Subjects: | design practice, research methods, performance management, Geography, building construction, research management, design efficiency, industry analysis, data collection methods, profession, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here