Future proofing for hospital building design: From research to practice

Memari, S; Kocaturk, T; Lozanovska, M; Andrews, F and Tucker, R (2023) Future proofing for hospital building design: From research to practice. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(6), pp. 681-700. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The rapid increase of rates of change, disruptive events, risk and uncertainty increasingly threaten the long-term utilisation of hospital buildings. This challenge calls for an evolution in the lifecycle thinking that has always been integral to the hospital building design processes; or an approach that is termed 'future proofing'. Yet the implementation of future proofing as an emerging design requirement is impeded by lack of holistic understanding of the concept, and clarity about its objectives. As such, this research aims to provide a conceptualisation of future proofing via a taxonomic hierarchy. We interviewed sixteen experienced hospital architects from leading consultant firms across Australia to explore their general perceptions, and implementation in practice, of future proofing. The semi-structured interviews were informed by and indeed tested a theoretical model of future proofing previously constructed via literature review and were analysed and validated via thematic analysis and member checking. Our findings align theoretical understanding with hospital architects' practice-based perceptions and experiences of future proofing; elucidating future proofing as a dynamic meta-capability involving a multi-purpose hierarchy. Accordingly, a hierarchical integrated model of future proofing in practice was developed based on three axes (Survive, Evolve and Thrive), respectively defining three sets of spectrums with two extremes ranging from passivity to activity (Resilience-Mitigation, Maintainability-Improvement, and Changeability-Transition). While in previous research future proofing has been oversimplified and perceived largely in terms of adaptability, our findings support a more expansive definition of future proofing that includes various lifecycle design considerations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptability; changeability; flexibility; future hospitals‌; future proofing; hospital architects‌; hospital building design; improvement; maintainability; mitigation; resilience; sustainability; transition‌; ‌healthcare design
Index terms: evolution, lifecycle, thematic analysis, adaptability, architect, mitigation, implementation, building design, interview, integrated model, maintainability, literature review, consultant firm, Australia
Subjects: user focus, organization, profession, data collection methods, architectural design, analytical methods, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, environmental science, maintenance engineering, financial risk, methods and analysis, Geography
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here