Al-Tabtabai, H; Kartam, N; Flood, I A N and Alex, A P (1997) Expert judgment in forecasting construction project completion. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 4(4), pp. 271-293. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Construction projects are susceptible to cost and time overruns. Variations from planned schedule and cost estimates can result in huge losses for owners and contractors. In extreme cases, the viability of the project itself is jeopardised as a result of variations from baseline plans. Hence new methods and techniques which assist project managers in forecasting the expected variance in schedule and cost should be developed. This paper proposes a judgment-based forecasting approach which will identify schedule variances from a baseline plan for typical construction projects. The proposed forecasting approach adopts multiple regression techniques and further utilises neural networks to capture the decision-making procedure of project experts involved in schedule monitoring and prediction. The models developed were applied to a multistorey building project under construction and were found feasible for use in similar construction projects. The advantages and limitations of these two modelling process for prediction of schedule variance are discussed. The developed models were integrated with existing project management computer systems for the convenient and realistic generation of revised schedules at appropriate junctures during the progress of the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; expert judgment; project management; regression analysis; schedule variance |
| Index terms: | forecasting, project management, modelling, multiple-regression, owner, construction project, cost estimate, project manager, computer system, variation, regression analysis, time overrun, judgment, schedule monitoring, neural network, decision-making, variance, artificial neural network |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, project controls, sociology, decision analysis, measurement and scaling, statistical analysis, profession, dispute resolution, modelling and simulation, artificial intelligence, computing systems, production management, analytical methods, project management theory and practice, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Contract Administration, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here