Dalgliesh, C D; Bowen, P A and Hill, R C (1997) Environmental sustainability in the delivery of affordable housing in South Africa. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 4(1), pp. 23-39. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Housing delivery systems have been classified as developmentally-orientated or conventionally-orientated. It has been claimed that a developmentally-orientated approach to building procurement would encompass the parameters of community empowerment and participation in design, job creation via the development process, and economically and environmentally-sustainable procurement (Taylor & Norval 1995). New building procurement systems display an increasing awareness of sustainability, but concentrate on economic and social sustainability, as opposed to environmental sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to document and evaluate the extent to which issues of environmental sustainability have been incorporated in the delivery of affordable housing in South Africa. The paper elaborates on a range of relevant principles for sustainable construction, which incorporate: minimisation of resource use; maximisation of reuse of resources; maximisation of use of renewable and recycled resources; use of non-toxic materials; protection of nature; achievement of quality criteria; and promotion of labour intensive methods, skills training and capacity enhancement of local people. The authors examine the extent to which the principles of environmental sustainability have been applied, both in practice and in the formulation of South African housing policy. Finally, recommendations are made for the application of criteria for environmental sustainability in the delivery process of affordable housing in South Africa.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | delivery; environment; housing; procurement; resource; sustainability |
| Index terms: | sustainable construction, minimization, empowerment, maximization, building procurement, housing delivery, environmental sustainability, housing, South Africa, promotion, housing policy, affordable housing, social sustainability |
| Subjects: | construction type, public policy, contractual arrangements, algorithms, management, sustainable construction, Geography, health safety and environment, housing and residential development, communities and social development |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Governance, Health and Safety, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here