Akintoye, A; Taylor, C and Fitzgerald, E (1998) Risk analysis and management of private finance initiative projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(1), pp. 9-21. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) is a recent development in the UK in which private sector organisations, design, build, finance and operate assets to deliver a service to public sector clients. The initiative is expected to bring the private sector's finance, management skills and expertise into projects which would normally be undertaken by the public sector. Equivalents of this initiative, also found outside the UK, include DBFO (Design Build Finance Operate), BOO (Build Own Operate) and turnkey projects. Two important considerations for a project to receive an approval for the initiative are that it must represent value for money and there must be sufficient transfer of risk to the private sector. This paper, based on a questionnaire survey, provided the perceptions of clients, contractors and financial institutions on risk associated with PFI and how these determine their approach to PFI schemes. The analysis shows that design changes and the level of information on functional, performance and output requirements for PFI schemes are of major concern to the parties involved in this procurement route.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | private finance; procurement; public sector; risk |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, private finance initiative, value-for-money, private finance, turnkey project, approval, risk analysis, private sector organization, private sector, public-sector client, design change, public sector, design-build-finance-operate, survey |
| Subjects: | administrative law, industry analysis, sociology, contractual role, environmental hazards, evaluation, contractual arrangements, organization, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Value Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Procurement, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here