Gowri, K and Depanni, S (1998) The health and safety expert system (HASES): An expert system framework for building inspections. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(1), pp. 92-101. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
In order to ensure the health and safety of occupants, buildings must be inspected to check their compliance to current regulatory requirements prompted by occupancy changes, renovations and building code revisions. Recent inspections conducted by Public Works Canada have identified about 1700 occurrences of code violations in 19 buildings. There is an enormous amount of information that can be extracted from the study mentioned above to implement a knowledge-based expert system to assist in future building inspections. The philosophy of this expert system is to integrate both knowledge-based and hypertext representation techniques to enable building inspectors to quickly identify code violations, refer to the code text and provide case study information that can assist in resolving a problem. The present paper describes the development framework and details of a prototype implementation known as the Health and Safety Expert System (HASES). The HASES currently addresses the requirements of Section 3.4: Requirements for Exits' of the 1990 National Building Code of Canada. The software architecture consists of an external database of building details, an object hierarchy and a rule-base representing the code requirements, hypertext user-interface for code text and case study information. The ultimate objective is to make this system available for field inspections using notepad computers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building code; building inspection; expert system; knowledge representation |
| Index terms: | health and safety, database, renovation, Canada, building code, public work, implementation, prototype, philosophy, violation, inspection, case study, compliance, expert system |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, contractual arrangements, quality assurance, regulatory law, Geography, health safety and environment, modelling and simulation, data management, renovation and retrofit, infrastructure engineering, philosophical studies |
| Topics: | Procurement, Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here