Kumaraswamy, M M (1998) Industry development through creative project packaging and integrated management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(3), pp. 228-237. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
The findings from a set of related investigations into construction megaproject management were integrated into models, frameworks and basic guidelines that would help to improve and integrate (1) work packaging, (2) project participant selection and (3) operational management subsystems. More creative approaches to work packaging and participant selection were seen to significantly support construction industry development and the consequent longer-term benefits in developing countries. A paradigm of technology exchange' is proposed as the basis of more viable and mutually beneficial joint ventures which would also facilitate the innovative packaging and integrated management of megaprojects in developing countries. Additionally, it is recommended that hitherto isolated initiatives related to quality, safety or dispute resolution/avoidance should be integrated into synergistic management systems which also incorporate built-in monitoring and evaluation sub-systems. In turn, the latter would trigger both short- and long-term remedial measures related to improved project packaging, for example, as well as to personnel training and organizational development programmes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing country; joint venture; major project; procurement; technology transfer |
| Index terms: | programme, management system, personnel, developing country, megaproject, technology transfer, organizational development, major project, construction industry development, dispute, joint venture, resolution, investigation, industry development, paradigm, monitoring |
| Subjects: | project controls, conflict resolution, development economics, management, education and knowledge transfer, knowledge management, strategic project management, control systems, dispute resolution, data collection methods, organization, business |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Human Resources, International Construction, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here