Noorzai, E; Bakmohammadi, P and Garmaroudi, M A (2023) Optimizing daylight, energy and occupant comfort performance of classrooms with photovoltaic integrated vertical shading devices. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 19(4), pp. 394-418. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This work proposes a multi-objective approach for optimizing the design of fixed vertical, parametrically modeled PV integrated shading devices to achieve their highest benefits to the indoor environment and residents in a classroom. Since the geometric design of conventional shading devices, whether in real-world applications or the literature, is usually restricted to non-amorphous and rectangular shapes, our goal is to gain insight into the likely advantages of employing panels with novel design alternatives. To this end, we initially developed a parametric model of shading devices containing planar PV panels utilizing the Grasshopper program. Next, the environmental plugins of Honeybee and Ladybug were used to assess daylight and energy operations along with occupants' thermal and visual comfort. Moreover, to lessen the required lighting energy and enhance users' visual convenience by providing appropriate illuminance levels required for a specific task, we divided the classroom into adjustable lighting zones. The last step was performing the optimization process via the Octopus plugin for Grasshopper and determining the optimal solutions. The numerical results of the annual simulations show that we reached considerable energy saving up to 20% while enhancing occupants' thermal and visual comfort.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building integrated photovoltaic shading devices; multi-objective optimization; parametric modeling; thermal comfort; visual comfort |
| Index terms: | shading, modelling, visual comfort, photovoltaic, comfort, thermal comfort, energy-saving, multi-objective optimization, program, classroom, indoor environment, illuminance |
| Subjects: | building design, algorithms, software systems, occupational health and safety management, building performance, environmental engineering, construction type, energy systems, environmental science, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here