Proverbs, D G; Holt, G D and Olomolaiye, P O (1998) A comparative evaluation of reinforcement fixing productivity rates amongst French, German and UK construction contractors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(4), pp. 350-358. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
A contrast of site productivity levels for an in situ concrete operation (reinforcement fixing) on a high-rise project amongst construction contractors from Germany, France and the UK is given. The productivity rates provided by contractors' planning engineers for a model construction project form the basis of this evaluation. Conclusions drawn, based on relatively small samples, are considered approximations of the actual productivity levels in each international location. An analysis of variance based on international origin indicates significant differences between these productivity rates. Generally, amongst the sample surveyed, UK and German contractors exhibit the most efficient levels of labour productivity for the operations observed, whilst French contractors are by far the least productive. For the model building, UK contractors are the most productive, requiring less labour input than those from Germany and France. The UK contractors also demonstrate a high degree of performance variation. Leading on from these analyses, a construction (labour) cost comparison indicates the UK to be the most economic location. A comparison with previous research indicates contrasting findings. It is concluded that the performance ranking of French, German and UK contractors will vary depending upon the construction operations concerned, and therefore, assumptions regarding national contracting industries should not be based on individual operations. Contractors could benefit from developing closer links with their international counterparts since this would facilitate dissemination of European best practice'.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | productivity rates; European comparison; labour costs; reinforcement operation; analysis of variance |
| Index terms: | France, construction project, dissemination, variation, Germany, construction contractor, variance, productivity, engineer, construction operation, in-situ, best practice, labour cost, reinforcement, labour productivity |
| Subjects: | building construction, measurement and scaling, cost management, management, production management, Geography, contractual condition, knowledge translation, building materials, construction operations, profession, business, practitioner |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Site Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here