Jaafari, A L I and Manivong, K (1999) The need for life-cycle integration of project processes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 6(3), pp. 235-255. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
The focus of this paper is on life-cycle objective-based project management systems in general, and SPMIS in particular. SPMIS (short for Smart Project Management Information System), has been designed: (a) to facilitate the employment of life-cycle objective-based project management approaches; and (b) to support concurrent engineering and construction, thus promoting greater integration of the processes under which projects are proposed and implemented. In order to validate the functions designed for SPMIS the authors undertook a detailed case study of a large capital project. The actual project management functions employed by the project team on the case project were researched and charted using the best current PM practices as the guide. While this field research shed light on the actual needs and requirements, the design of the SPMIS functions was approached from first principles in order to incorporate the basic shift from the traditional objectives of cost, time, and quality to life-cycle objective functions, such as return on investment, facility operability, and life-cycle integration. This paper describes the fundamental philosophy and framework for the development of life-cycle objective function-based project management systems in general, and contrasts these with the existing PM methods.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capital project; consurrent construction; life cycle cost; project management; smart project management system |
| Index terms: | concurrent engineering, employment, project management, integration, philosophy, life cycle cost, information system, return on investment, case study, capital project, project team |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, organizational analysis, data collection methods, strategic project management, project delivery, information systems, philosophical studies, management, project management theory and practice, research methods, engineering methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Project Management, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here