The compatibility of construction companies' human resource development policies with employee career expectations

Dainty, A R J; Bagilhole, B M and Neale, R H (2000) The compatibility of construction companies' human resource development policies with employee career expectations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(2), pp. 169-178. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

In order to retain and motivate employees, organizations must respond to their expectations, both in terms of meeting formal aspects of their employment contracts and in addressing their less formal expectations of the employment relationship. Within the current human resources management (HRM) literature, these informal expectations are known as psychological contracts. This paper reports on research that explored psychological contracts within the construction industry. In-depth interviews were held with more than 80 construction managers and professional staff who worked for five large UK contracting organizations. The interviewees were asked to describe their career histories, and to discuss any tensions between the personnel policies of their organizations and their personal career aspirations and expectations. It emerged that responsibility for human resource development (HRD) had been largely devolved to divisional and operational management. This led to HRD becoming fragmented and unresponsive, and to employees becoming disillusioned by their employers' failure to meet their expectations. It is argued that construction companies require a more sophisticated understanding of their employees' expectations of the employment relationship if they are to be retained in the long term.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: career development; human resource development; psychological contracts; staff retention
Index terms: construction industry, psychological contract, employment, retention, becoming, history, contracting organization, construction manager, career, human resource, construction company, personnel, interview
Subjects: professional development, management, industry analysis, philosophical process, practitioner, organization, profession, data collection methods, architectural and construction history, psychology
Topics: Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here