Integrated management systems: A single management system solution for project control?

Griffith, A (2000) Integrated management systems: A single management system solution for project control? Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(3), pp. 232-240. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, the construction industry has embraced quality management systems (QMS). More recently, environmental issues and health and safety legislation have introduced additional dedicated control procedures: environmental management systems (EMS) and health and safety management systems (H&SMS). Systems, in particular those used for quality management, have been widely accused of being bureaucratic, arduous, paper driven and of questionable value to construction management. The genuine need is for improved systems that enable a contracting organization to control the key management functions of quality, environment and safety with maximum effectiveness and minimum bureaucracy. The findings presented in this paper show that a forward-looking approach can bring together these individual functions within an integrated management system (IMS). This allows an organization to move away from traditional vertical and separate management systems towards a single cross-functional horizontal system that can benefit both the corporate and the project organizations. The idea of an IMS for quality, environment and safety has only recently emerged within the UK construction industry. A small number of UK contracting organizations are, therefore, at the forefront of both national and international developments. Based on a questionnaire survey of 12 UK contracting organizations, this paper examines the purpose, characteristics, properties and intent of a single system approach, or IMS for quality, environment and safety, and considers its role within and it significance to contracting organizations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; environment; integrated management systems; quality; safety; standards; systems
Index terms: international development, survey, project organization, management system, health and safety, legislation, environmental management system, environmental issue, contracting organization, questionnaire, control procedure, project control, health and safety management, construction industry, quality management, effectiveness, quality management system
Subjects: environmental issues, control systems, practitioner, strategic management, data collection methods, legal systems, project delivery, health safety and environment, organizational theory, management, performance management, industry analysis, quality assurance
Topics: Quality Management, International Construction, Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here