Effect of registration on performance of construction subcontractors in Singapore

Hong Loh, W and Ofori, G (2000) Effect of registration on performance of construction subcontractors in Singapore. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(1), pp. 29-40. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

The construction industries of many countries rely heavily on subcontracting. As a result, the quality of subcontractors is important as it has a direct bearing on the performance of the main contractor on projects. A large proportion of construction work in Singapore is subcontracted. Despite the well-known and widely regretted deficiencies in the traditional subcontracting system, only recently have attempts been made to reform it. The most significant of these efforts is the Singapore List of Trade Subcontractors (SLOTS). This study sought to investigate whether or not the performance of subcontractors has been improved following the introduction of the SLOTS scheme. The research was based on a survey of project managers of main contractors. A major finding was that the SLOTS-registered contractors were perceived to perform better than nonregistered ones. Suggestions for improving the SLOTS scheme are offered in this paper.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: labour subcontracting; performance; registration; Singapore; the future
Index terms: Singapore, main contractor, project manager, subcontracting, construction work, subcontracting system, construction industry, survey, subcontractor
Subjects: industry analysis, Geography, operations management, practitioner, organization, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here