Ofori, G and Lean Chan, S (2000) Growth paths of construction enterprises in Singapore, 1980-98. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(3), pp. 307-321. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Construction companies have several possible growth paths to follow in their effort to develop. Studies show that the appropriate approach depends on the features of the company and the prevailing economic conditions, and support measures and incentives. This paper reports the results of a study on the paths which construction enterprises in Singapore have adopted since 1980. The main basis of the study was a mailed questionnaire survey. It was found that most local contractors have grown by working at home, either as main contractors or as specialist subcontractors. Some theoretical implications of the findings are outlined. Recommendations are offered on appropriate growth paths for Singaporean contractors under various circumstances.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction enterprises; future action; growth paths; Singapore |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, subcontractor, local contractor, construction company, survey, economic condition, main contractor, Singapore |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, organization, data collection methods, practitioner, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here