Tah, J H M and Carr, V (2000) Information modelling for a construction project risk management system. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(2), pp. 107-119. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
The construction industry is greatly plagued by risk; too often, this risk is not dealt with adequately, resulting in poor project performance. Communication of construction project risks in practice is poor, incomplete and inconsistent, both throughout the supply chain and through the project lifecycle. Part of the problem is the lack of a formalized approach to the project risk management process. Recently, attempts have been made to overcome this and this paper uses these attempts as a foundation for building a better approach to construction risk management. Underlying this approach is the development of a common language for describing risks and remedial actions. This is grounded in a taxonomy of risk based on a hierarchical risk breakdown structure. In addition, to facilitate the production of a working risk management system, a number of models have been developed using unified modelling language (UML) and IDEFO. Finally, the use of the system has been tested via a working software prototype. This prototype is being used as a basis for discussion with practitioners with regard to the practical requirements of the approach for further development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fuzzy logic; Integration DEFinition language; object modelling; project risk analysis and management; qualitative risk assessment; unified modelling language |
| Index terms: | fuzzy logic, project lifecycle, information modelling, project risk management, project risk analysis, risk assessment, project performance, risk management, construction industry, taxonomy, modelling, risk breakdown structure, prototype, integration, construction project, practitioner |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, analytical methods, data science, data analysis and analytics, project completion, risk assessment, practitioner, organizational analysis, industry analysis, digital design, project management theory and practice, financial risk, production management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here