Enhancing building product libraries to enable the dynamic definition of design element specifications

Underwood, J; Alshawi, M A; Aouad, G; Child, T and Faraj, I Z (2000) Enhancing building product libraries to enable the dynamic definition of design element specifications. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(4), pp. 373-388. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

The AIC Research Group at the University of Salford has been involved in a government-funded project that has resulted in the development of an integrated multi-user distributed construction project database through the implementation of next-generation Internet technology together with Product Data Technology - WISPER. The objective of the project was to develop a working system capable of demonstrating the future direction of information integration with the project partners' businesses. This paper presents the development of the specification application that aims to demonstrate the potential for such technologies to enhance the specification process, enabling design elements to be specified directly from a building product database Web site.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design element specifications; IFC; integrated distributed construction project database; three-tier client server architecture; STEP Part 21 physical file
Index terms: implementation, information integration, internet, specification, construction project, project partner, product library, database
Subjects: modelling and simulation, data management, computing systems, information systems, sociology, contractual condition, production management, contractual arrangements
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here