Arditi, D; Tokdemir, O B and Suh, K (2001) Scheduling system for repetitive unit construction using line-of-balance technology. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(2), pp. 90-103. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Although line-of-balance (LOB) scheduling can be superior to bar charts and networks in repetitive-unit construction, there are indications that its use is not widespread. In this study, the major limitations of the existing LOB methodology are identified and then eliminated by developing a computer program called repetitive unit scheduling system (RUSS). An effective algorithm that facilitates the implementation of LOB scheduling is developed. A tool that handles logical and strategic limitations caused by the particular characteristics of repetitive activities is provided. A learning model is developed and incorporated into LOB calculations. The program is designed to optimize resource allocation by using multiples of the natural rhythm of activities. An optimum crew size that guarantees maximum productivity in an activity is used throughout the LOB calculations to achieve cost-optimized schedules. Non-linear and discrete activities are incorporated into the LOB calculations. RUSS displays the LOB diagram of every individual path in the unit network. It is believed that a system such as RUSS will make the LOB method more appealing to contractors of repetitive projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | line-of-balance; linear scheduling; repetitive construction |
| Index terms: | productivity, repetitive project, resource allocation, implementation, computer program, repetitive construction, guarantee, scheduling, program, methodology, linear scheduling |
| Subjects: | operations research, resource management, contractual arrangements, research methods, software systems, management, contract structure, production management, building construction |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Procurement, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here