Boussabaine, A H (2001) Neurofuzzy modelling of construction projects' duration I: Principles. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(2), pp. 104-113. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Construction projects' duration can be modelled using traditional and artificial intelligence methods. The first part of these two papers provides an insight into the principles of modelling project durations using neurofuzzy methods. This paper presents an understanding of how these methods operate and discusses the main issues concerning their use and application in construction management. An introduction to the problems of modelling and predicting construction projects' duration is first presented. This is followed by explaining the neurofuzzy life cycle modelling process and discussing methods for modelling projects' duration. A graphical presentation of the way in which neurofuzzy methods operate is also presented and discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | forecasting; fuzzy systems; management; modelling; neurofuzzy; projects duration |
| Index terms: | modelling, life cycle, forecasting, construction project, artificial intelligence, duration |
| Subjects: | production management, artificial intelligence, analytical methods, prediction and forecasting, project controls, value management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here