Lam, K C; Hu, T; Cheung, S O; Yuen, R K K and Deng, Z M (2001) Multi-project cash flow optimization: Non-inferior solution through neuro-multiobjective algorithm. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(2), pp. 130-144. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Modelling of the multiproject cash flow decisions in a contracting firm facilitates optimal resource utilization, financial planning, profit forecasting and enables the inclusion of cash-flow liquidity in forecasting. However, a great challenge for contracting firm to manage his multiproject cash flow when large and multiple construction projects are involved (manipulate large amount of resources, e.g. labour, plant, material, cost, etc.). In such cases, the complexity of the problem, hence the constraints involved, renders most existing regular optimization techniques computationally intractable within reasonable time frames. This limit inhibits the ability of contracting firms to complete construction projects at maximum efficiency through efficient utilization of resources among projects. Recently, artificial neural networks have demonstrated its strength in solving many optimization problems efficiently. In this regard a novel recurrent-neural-network model that integrates multi-objective linear programming and neural network (MOLPNN) techniques has been developed. The model was applied to a relatively large contracting company running 10 projects concurrently in Hong Kong. The case study verified the feasibility and applicability of the MOLPNN to the defined problem. A comparison undertaken of two optimal schedules (i.e. risk-avoiding scheme A and risk-seeking scheme B) of cash flow based on the decision maker's preference is described in this paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow; construction; neuro-multiobjective; optimization; risk-seeking |
| Index terms: | linear programming, Hong Kong, optimization technique, efficiency, liquidity, resource utilization, forecasting, case study, modelling, neural network, profit, artificial neural network, cash flow, financial planning, preference, complexity, construction project |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, algorithms, performance management, financial management, production management, Geography, systems engineering, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, site logistics, economic analysis, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here