A BIM-based semantic approach for fund-allocation of building components

Ahmed Gouda, M and Marzouk, M (2024) A BIM-based semantic approach for fund-allocation of building components. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(3), pp. 471-493. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

This paper articulates the fund allocation and prioritization challenge for existing building facilities' Maintenance and Repair (M&R) interventions. Despite the existing conspicuous research in funding allocation, there is a dearth of comprehensive insight into which facilities necessitate maintenance, when to intervene, and the strategies to adopt. Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Facility Management data for fund allocation decisions remains challenging, and existing models lack a thorough portrayal of as-is information for M&R interventions and funding allocation. To this end, this study proposes an integrated BIM-based fund allocation and prioritization framework to bridge these gaps. The framework incorporates as-is BIM semantic knowledge and utilizes a genetic algorithm optimization scheme to determine interventions based on condition state, future deterioration rate, and relative weighted importance. The research objectives include constructing an as-is BIM model, formalizing as-is knowledge using BIM standards, allocating funding efficiently, and determining optimum timing and type of interventions. The developed framework is enacted in a real-case scenario for validation and verification, and findings unveiled the proposed paradigm capabilities as a decision support system for fund allocation and prioritization, enabling facility managers to constitute informed decisions based on building facilities' as-is information, deterioration rates, and relative importance weight.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Architecture; As-is BIM; fund-allocation; building management; prioritization model; genetic algorithm; Decision support systems; Semantics; Maintenance; Building components; Genetic algorithms; Facilities management; Funding; Building information modeling; Repair & maintenance
Index terms: building information modelling, relative importance, deterioration, building management, manager, decision support, fund allocation, genetic algorithm, semantics, strategy, funding, paradigm, validation, facilities management, repair, building component
Subjects: decision analysis, information systems, maintenance engineering, algorithms, architectural elements, education and knowledge transfer, management, professional development, material degradation and durability, economic analysis, analytical methods, risk assessment, practitioner
Topics: Design Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Materials, Risk Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here