Proverbs, D G and Faniran, O O (2001) International construction performance comparisons: A study of European' and Australian contractors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 8(4), pp. 284-291. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
International research concerning the comparative performance and practices of construction contractors from three European countries (UK, France and Germany) has been previously reported. The research has recently been extended to include Australian construction companies, thereby providing the potential for further exploring international contractor performance, the results of which are herein presented. The research methodology involves a questionnaire survey of contractors whereby a hypothetical high rise in situ concrete building is presented to respondents. Participants of the survey are asked to provide various performance data and preferred construction practices for this building. Results suggest that French contractors acquire the fastest construction speeds closely followed by those from Australia. Construction practices are similar in the UK and Australia, which contrast with French and German practice whose preferences were also found to be different. Findings suggest Australian contractors achieve higher levels of performance than those from the UK whilst implementing similar practices. Further research is needed to investigate the cause of the performance disparity found to exist in these two countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor performance; high-rise; in situ concrete; international comparison |
| Index terms: | high rise, preference, construction contractor, Germany, questionnaire, construction company, survey, international comparison, France, disparity, international construction, research methodology, in-situ, Australia, contractor performance |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, construction type, strategic management, data collection methods, organization, research design and methodology, practitioner, social justice, building construction, decision-making and reasoning, Geography, contract management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Ethics, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here