Atkinson, A R (2002) The pathology of building defects; a human error approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), pp. 53-61. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Research driven by major industrial and transportation incidents is increasingly emphasizing the role of managers and systems factors in errors. This is reflected in recent reports and legislation which place emphasis on managerial actions. This paper reports research developing a human error perspective, but applying it to lesser failures in the form of construction defects. An observational study of a 61 unit housing site confirms findings from earlier studies, that managerial factors are important in the occurrence of defects, but also that factors can be linked in a causal chain'. Latent managerial errors are often hidden behind more obvious operative errors, leading to incorrect attributions and ineffective remedial action. The study also supports a conceptual model of the nature of errors in construction projects, which makes explicit the influence of management on the generation of defects and the need to treat organizations as a whole in considering the reasons for failure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | defects; error; management; participant observation; systems |
| Index terms: | observation, operative, pathology, construction project, building defect, manager, housing, legislation, construction defect |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, practitioner, construction type, contract obligations, professional practice, production management, legal systems, medical science and clinical practice |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Project Management, Construction Technology, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here