A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain

Love, P E D; Irani, Z; Cheng, E and Li, H (2002) A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), pp. 2-15. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

The construction industry is highly fragmented and adversarial in nature, which has resulted in it being criticized for its poor project performance and lack of innovation. To improve performance, particularly inter-organizational relations, organizations need to consider the formation of alliances with their project partners. Some construction organizations are beginning to initiate short-term alliances with their customers and suppliers as part of a supply chain management strategy. However, such short-term alliances inhibit feedback, which in turn supports learning and the development of mutual trust and cooperation. It is proffered that construction organizations should consider developing long-term alliances, so as to enable parties to form learning alliances. The implications of forming different types of strategic alliances/partnering in construction are discussed. An inter-organizational model that can be used to support learning and is founded on the principles of total quality management (TQM) is described. A case study is used to demonstrate that cooperative relationships can be used to cultivate a culture for reflective learning and mutual trust, beyond merely project-specific performance improvements.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; learning; partnering; strategic alliances; total quality management
Index terms: partnering, construction organization, management strategy, case study, strategic alliance, performance improvement, project performance, project partner, construction industry, total quality management, cooperation
Subjects: performance measurement, management, project management theory and practice, partnership management, sociology, industry analysis, data collection methods, organization, psychology, evaluation methods
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here