Macmillan, S; Steele, J; Kirby, P; Spence, R and Austin, S (2002) Mapping the design process during the conceptual phase of building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(3), pp. 174-180. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
This paper reports the outcome of a 2-year research project that set out to provide a process map of the concept stage of building projects. From a literature review, comparison of current process maps, and through interviews and case study analyses, a tentative new framework for the concept stage was developed and tested. It comprises 12 activities in five phases. The framework formed the basis of a graphical method used to plot the activities of design teams in a series of workshops. This graphical method illustrates design iteration in a way which we believe has not been undertaken before, and the patterns it reveals are intuitively understood by design team members themselves, helping them reflect on their own design process. We have also constructed a prototype internet-based decision support tool for the concept stage of design. This is intended to be inherently flexible and supportive of non-linear routes through concept design, while also offering a structured approach, design tools to broaden the solution space or evaluate competing options, team management advice, and the recording of decision making. Initial testing of this tool showed it to be well-received, although it was criticized for focusing too much on the gates between activities and too little on the issues and decisions within each activity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; concept design; design process; decision support; process map |
| Index terms: | concept design, decision support, workshop, literature review, testing, building design, option, prototype, internet, design team, mapping, decision-making, design process, interview, maps, case study, team management |
| Subjects: | practitioner, computing systems, modelling and simulation, decision analysis, architectural design, data collection methods, construction type, data analysis and analytics, spatial and geospatial analysis, design methods, design process, professional practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here