Singh, A (2002) Behavioural perceptions of design and construction engineers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(2), pp. 66-80. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Hemisphericity in behaviour studies is the role and dominance of right bran/left brain in the human brain, each side of which has varying roles and characteristics, thereby leading to different thinking orientations in the human. A study was conducted to measure the hemisphericity orientation of construction and design engineers in a large public construction organization. We know from literature that people of different hemisphericity orientations have unlike personalities and dissimilar perspectives of specific situations. The essential characteristics of hemisphericity as established in literature are presented and used in analysing the organization. From this study of engineers, it was seen that construction engineers in the organization, State Department of Engineering Construction (SDEC), are predominantly left-brained while design engineers are predominantly right-brained. This difference in orientation partially explains why the design and construction engineers at SDEC are unable to see eye-to-eye in issues concerning implementation of drawings. Left hemisphere dominant engineers are also seen to desire more organizational changes than their right hemisphere dominant counterparts. Ideally, researchers believe that a 50 50 distribution of hemisphericities in large organizations is desirable. Details, analysis, and recommendations are presented in the paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | brain; hemisphericity; management; organization; performance; personality |
| Index terms: | organizational change, drawing, personality, engineer, design and construction, public construction, implementation |
| Subjects: | building construction, behavioral psychology, technical documentation, contractual arrangements, profession, business |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here