Watson, R; Lockley, S R and Shaaban, S (2002) Creating usable models for re-usable data: Managing electronic project specification information. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(3), pp. 272-283. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Small architectural firms (those that employ less than six people) account for an estimated 4525 or 74% of the total number of practices in the UK (RIBA, 2000), and market research has shown that there is a poor uptake of existing project specification information technologies in this sector. We present the results of an analysis of the ways that small practices currently create, manage and communicate project specification information and an overview of our research into new models to support these processes. The research has focused on the creation and population of appropriate, re-usable information models and we describe these in the context of other modelling initiatives in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. The research has resulted in the definition of a large pool of domain specific data objects, which have the potential to provide a generic information resource for the industry. The Architectural Informatics Group, in conjunction with the National Building Specification (NBS), have implemented the results of this research through the development of a new commercial software tool for use in small design practices in the UK.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | AEC; information; model; specification |
| Index terms: | specification, market research, informatic, population, information technology, architectural firm, design practice, building specification, modelling |
| Subjects: | information science, market analysis, demography, design process, contractual condition, analytical methods, professional practice, computing systems, business |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here