Parameters governing the selection of procurement system - An empirical survey

Luu, D T; Ng, S T and Chen, S E (2003) Parameters governing the selection of procurement system - An empirical survey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(3), pp. 209-218. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

The lack of structured procedures, based on good information, for the selection of construction procurement system sometimes inhibits the opportunity for clients to choose a procurement option in a fully informed manner. The selection and use of an unsuitable procurement approach could eventually lead to project failure. To formalise the procurement selection procedures, clients should establish a set of appropriate procurement selection parameters (PSPs) based on their distinctive characteristics and objectives, project requirements, and external environment. In this paper, a list of 34 PSPs was drawn up according to the findings of researchers in procurement selection. An empirical study was carried out in Australia with clients and project managers to unveil the importance and interrelationships of the identified PSPs. The results indicate that the perception of clients and project managers on the importance of PSPs was generally consistent that underlying relationships do exist among parameters, and there is a need for clients to ensure that the interrelated PSPs are not overlooked when assessing the suitability of construction procurement systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; procurement; project management
Index terms: construction industry, option, project management, empirical study, construction procurement, procurement system, Australia, project manager, project failure, suitability, survey
Subjects: Geography, project management theory and practice, research methods, industry analysis, design criteria, decision analysis, profession, data collection methods, project completion, contractual arrangements
Topics: Design Practice, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here