Price, A D F (2003) The strategy process within large construction orgnisations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(4), pp. 283-296. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
This paper investigates current approaches to the process of managing strategy within the construction industry. The results from nine case studies have been summarised under the headings of: defining the process of developing strategy; activities and outputs associated with the strategic process; strategic tools and techniques used in the process; outputs to the strategic process and factors that govern strategic success time scale for planning horizons; the level of personnel involvement; and the most important factors for successful implementation of strategy. The strategic frameworks adopted by the case study organisations have been combined into a single framework for managing the strategic process. Several issues of strategic concern were identified and recommendations have been put forward under three headings: development of the strategic process; improvement of internal and external audits; and increased application of appropriate tools and techniques.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; case studies; construction industry; physical planning; strategic planning |
| Index terms: | personnel, strategy, strategic planning, implementation, construction industry, case study, audit |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, contractual arrangements, management, performance measurement, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here