BIM-based task planning method for wheeled-legged rebar binding robot

Cao, S; Duan, H; Guo, S; Wu, J; Ai, T and Jiang, H (2024) BIM-based task planning method for wheeled-legged rebar binding robot. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(3), pp. 656-672. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) data has the advantages of high quality, operability, and parametric capabilities. In recent years, the application of BIM in construction planning for building robots has been increasing. Task planning for rebar binding is an important aspect of construction, and there is a growing trend of using robots to improve the accuracy and efficiency of binding operations. However, the complex and dynamic construction site environment poses significant challenges for task planning in rebar binding. Therefore, this paper proposes a new BIM-based task planning method for a wheeled-legged rebar binding robot, which can quickly generate an optimal task sequence. Firstly, an initial set of rebar intersection points is generated based on BIM data. Then, considering the execution dead zone of the robot and the variable workspace of the binding mechanism, the rebar intersection points set is decomposed and filtered using morphological opening operations. Finally, a constrained genetic algorithm is employed to sort the set of task points. Simulation and real-world experiments were conducted using a wheeled-legged rebar binding robot as the research subject. The results demonstrate that, compared to manual planning, the average binding efficiency is approximately 1500 points per hour, which is 1.97 times higher than manual operation. This validates the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture; wheeled-legged rebar binding robot; open operation; task planning; genetic algorithms; construction planning; building information modeling
Index terms: building information modelling, efficiency, genetic algorithm, planning method, construction site, workspace, accuracy, experiment, effectiveness, rebar, construction planning
Subjects: information systems, professional development, management, algorithms, performance management, construction planning, urban planning, work location, building materials, data collection methods
Topics: Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here