Vee, C and Skitmore, M (2003) Professional ethics in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(2), pp. 117-127. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Provides results of a small, but representative, questionnaire survey of typical project managers, architects and building contractors concerning their views and experiences on a range of ethical issues surrounding construction industry activities. Most (90 per cent) subscribed to a professional code of ethics and many (45 per cent) had an ethical code of conduct in their employing organisations, with the majority (84 per cent) considering good ethical practice to be an important organisational goal. It was agreed by 93 per cent of the respondents that "business ethics" should be driven or governed by "personal ethics", with 84 per cent of respondents stating that a balance of both the requirements of the client and the impact on the public should be maintained. No respondent was aware of any cases of employers attempting to force their employees to initiate, or participate in, unethical conduct. Despite this, all the respondents had witnessed or experienced some degree of unethical conduct, in the form of unfair conduct, negligence, conflict of interest, collusive tendering, fraud, confidentiality and propriety breach, bribery and violation of environmental ethics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; ethics; professions; surveys |
| Index terms: | construction industry, profession, architect, ethics, building contractor, project manager, unethical conduct, violation, questionnaire, confidentiality, professional ethics, business ethics, negligence, survey, fraud |
| Subjects: | professional practice, ethical practice, practitioner, institututions, data collection methods, profession, liability law, professional ethics, industry analysis, regulatory law |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here