Evaluating engineering consultants' general capabilities during the pre-selection process: A Hong Kong study

ng, S T and Chow, L K (2004) Evaluating engineering consultants' general capabilities during the pre-selection process: A Hong Kong study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(3), pp. 150-158. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Consultant pre-selection is an essential process to distinguish capable candidates before they are invited to submit their technical and fee proposals for consultancy assignments. Despite that, many clients have their own criteria and emphasis, and this could result in discrepancies in pre-selection decisions. The aim of this paper is to devise a more objective framework for evaluating consultants' general capabilities during the pre-selection process. The paper begins by identifying the commonly used criteria for pre-selecting engineering consultants. In order to examine the importance of consultant pre-selection criteria (CPC), a questionnaire survey has been conducted with clients who are responsible for pre-selecting their consultants; and consultants being pre-selected by the clients. The findings reveal that the perception of the client and consultant groups on the importance of CPC was very consistent. Finally, a multi-criteria model for evaluating consultants' general capabilities during the pre-selection is proposed. Based on each candidate score, clients can determine which engineering consultants should be invited to bid for a consultancy assignment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: consultants; Hong Kong; selection
Index terms: selection criteria, engineering consultant, Hong Kong, consultancy, questionnaire, survey, proposal
Subjects: project planning, organization, data collection methods, professional, Geography, tendering
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here