Akintoye, A and Chinyio, E (2005) Private finance initiative in the healthcare sector: Trends and risk assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(6), pp. 601-616. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The UK Government has now adopted Private Finance Initiative (PFI) as a major vehicle for the delivery of additional resources to the health sector in order to achieve a greater investment in healthcare facilities. The purpose of this paper is to examine the trends and risk assessment of the PFI in the healthcare sector. Design/methodology/approach - The paper employed secondary data and interviews of key participants in two hospital PFI projects to highlight developments in healthcare PFI and the risk management of hospital projects. Findings - The results show that the use of PFI in the provision of healthcare is increasing in terms of number, capital value and size of projects. What emerged in the healthcare PFI project was a usage of a plethora of risk management techniques, albeit to varying degrees. Experience appeared to be the prime risk assessment technique employed, while risk avoidance was first explored before pricing and allocating any residual risks. "Risk prompts", such as using checklists and risk registers were also useful in the identification of risks. Among all participants, insurance cover and sub-contracting appear to be the most prominent strategies employed for managing out the risks. Originality/value - The negotiations that precede the signing of a healthcare PFI project contract had an impact on the final choice of facilities or their specifications. The two contracting parties sought a balance between an optimal allocation of risks, choice of facilities and project price. Although the risk management techniques being used are generic in nature, there is still no evidence at the moment to show that these are appropriate for PFI projects. It is important that further investigation is undertaken to assess the level of current skills in risk management techniques to deal with PFI projects and the extent to which these techniques are appropriate to tackle complex healthcare PFI projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health services sector; hospitals; private finance; procurement; risk management; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | United Kingdom, risk register, strategy, health services sector, specification, interview, evidence, methodology, private finance initiative, contracting party, private finance, secondary data, sub-contracting, pricing, negotiation, investigation, risk management, insurance, risk assessment |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, economic analysis, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, risk assessment, organization, industry analysis, conflict resolution, contractual condition, Geography, financial risk, management, research methods |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Contract Administration, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here