John, G A; Clements-Croome, D J; Fairey, V and Loy, H M (2005) Contextual prerequisites for the application of ILS principles to the building services industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(4), pp. 307-328. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This paper proposes assessing the context within which integrated logistic support (ILS) can be implemented for whole life performance of building services systems. Design/methodology/approach – The use of ILS within a throughlife business model (TLBM) is a better framework to achieve a welldesigned, constructed and managed product. However, for ILS to be implemented in a TLBM for building services systems, the practices, tools and techniques need certain contextual prerequisites tailored to suit the construction industry. These contextual prerequisites are discussed. Findings – The case studies conducted reinforced the contextual importance of prime contracting, partnering and team collaboration for the application of ILS techniques. The lack of data was a major hindrance to the full realisation of ILS techniques within the case studies. Originality/value – The paper concludes with the recognition of the value of these contextual prerequisites for the use of ILS techniques within the building industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building services; business support services; contracts; partnership |
| Index terms: | building service, partnering, case study, partnership, building industry, business model, construction industry, team collaboration, methodology, business support service |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, engineering systems, partnership management, industry analysis, collaborative management, research methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here