Kristiansen, K; Emmitt, S and Bonke, S (2005) Changes in the Danish construction sector: The need for a new focus. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(5), pp. 502-511. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - It was the aim of the analysis to draw an overall picture of the trends towards change in the construction industry, thereby forming a foundation for further analysis and appropriate future research. Design/methodology/ approach - A multi-method approach was taken to the data collection exercise comprising data collection from published sources, interviews with knowledgeable representatives of the Danish construction industry and direct observation of what was happening on construction projects in Denmark. Findings - The work reported here has shown that there is some benefit in looking at the internal changes in the construction sector from the point of view of the various actors, an approach that has provided contrasting information to the government-sponsored reports. The understanding of the industry as being backward and locked-in does not provide an accurate description of the Danish construction sector. The research has shown a dynamic industry that is changing relatively quickly as it responds to competition and new opportunities. Originality/value - The results of this research are reported and comparisons made with the less positive reports. From this a number of questions are raised about the scope of reports and the focus of future research into the Danish construction sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change management; construction industry; evolution; reports |
| Index terms: | evolution, construction sector, direct observation, methodology, Denmark, competition, construction industry, change management, interview, exercise, construction project |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, market analysis, environmental science, Geography, production management, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, research methods, management |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here