Matsumoto, I T; Stapleton, J; Glass, J and Thorpe, T (2005) Use of process maps to develop a management briefing sheet for a design consultancy. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(5), pp. 458-469. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Process mapping can lead to a more holistic understanding of how an organisation works. This paper seeks to discuss how an engineering design consultancy, which had developed a series of process maps on the design of steel frame buildings, developed a powerful management tool, the Management Briefing Sheet which has yielded numerous additional benefits enabling practice to be improved and quality procedures more easily accessed. Design/methodology/ approach - To maximise the knowledge and expertise of its supply chain partners and to better understand how it designed steel-framed buildings, the engineering design consultancy undertook a process-mapping exercise. Various techniques for documenting the process were considered, but a modified IDEF notation was chosen for its ability to capture the iterative nature of the design process and its methodical approach for deconstructing complicated activities. Findings - Process-mapping exercises can change the way organisations work and make them more efficient, but to do this the changes that would lead to improvements need to be implemented successfully. Carrying out a process-mapping exercise in isolation from the end-user can lead to complications. Research limitations/implications - The key obstacle to implementing change identified by the engineering design consultancy, with whom the MBS was developed, was delivering the knowledge acquired from the process analysis in a format that end-users could understand easily and adopt effectively. Originality/value - This article will be of significant use to any organisation wishing to maximise the knowledge and expertise of its supply chain partners and identify inefficient working practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design management; knowledge management systems; management activities; quality control |
| Index terms: | steel frame, consultancy, briefing, mapping, design management, methodology, design process, maps, quality control, engineering design, process analysis, working practice, knowledge management system, exercise |
| Subjects: | project delivery, organization, design methods, scope management, health behaviours and lifestyles, information systems, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, structural engineering, management, design process |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here