Edike, U E; Ameh, O J; Adenuga, O A and Akintunde, O P (2024) Life cycle energy analysis of houses incorporating conventional and alternative masonry units. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(5), pp. 1079-1099. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The use of alternative masonry units and technologies in traditional masonry work could reduce the life cycle energy of buildings. This study investigates the life cycle energy assessment of houses constructed using concrete blocks, eco-bricks and polymer bricks to evaluate the impacts of masonry units on the life cycle energy of buildings. Three bungalows of approximately 110 m2 each, having the same geometry but different types of wall materials, namely eco-bricks, polymer bricks, and concrete blocks, were used for the analysis. The study found embodied manufacturing energy of 0.346 MJ/kg for eco-bricks and 0.518 MJ/kg for polymer bricks. Approximately 85-86% of the total life cycle energy constitutes the operational phase energy. The polymer brick and eco-brick buildings had the least embodied construction energy of 14% of the total life cycle energy. The life cycle energy of concrete block buildings was 17.547 GJ/m2 at 50 years of service life. Buildings made of polymer bricks and eco-bricks had lower life cycle energy than the concrete block building. The study suggests a prudent selection of building materials by developers and construction professionals based on life cycle energy assessment to reduce the energy consumption of the building sector. Although the study focus is limited to eco-bricks, polymer bricks, and concrete blocks as masonry units in the Nigerian construction context, the method employed in the study is applicable to the energy analysis of other construction materials and geographical locations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building; eco-bricks; embodied construction energy; embodied energy assessment; total life cycle energy; Nigeria |
| Index terms: | geometry, service life, Nigeria, building material, energy analysis, construction professional, construction material, energy consumption, embodied energy, life cycle energy, concrete block |
| Subjects: | engineering analysis, asset management, professional development, Geography, energy systems, building materials, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here