Senaratne, S; Kagioglou, M; Amaratunga, D; Baldry, D; Aouad, G and Bowden, A (2005) Research knowledge transfer into teaching in the built environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(6), pp. 587-600. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - There is no automatic link between research and teaching in higher education institutions. Hence, in order to achieve a productive relationship, these two activities need to be linked through effective mechanisms. The research reported in this paper aims at identifying such strategies that are appropriate to a research-based department, in the built environment discipline. Design/methodology/approach - The paper identifies key issues related to this challenge through a literature review, and subsequently verifies those issues through an exploratory case study. Findings - The key finding from the study is that research-based departments are poor at transferring their research knowledge into teaching especially at undergraduate level. Even though there are informal strategies in existence, there is a strong need for formalising them. The paper utilises knowledge transfer and learning literature to fully understand the process. Originality/value - Drawing from the findings, the study develops a framework to enable the knowledge transfer from research into teaching. The framework provides useful guidance for research-based higher education departments in the built environment to transfer research knowledge into teaching in a formal and productive way.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | environmental management; higher education; knowledge transfer; research; teaching; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | undergraduate, built environment, environmental management, higher education institution, case study, higher education, methodology, knowledge transfer, drawing, United Kingdom, strategy, literature review |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, technical documentation, data analysis and analytics, curriculum development, research methods, sustainability assessment, management, Geography, educational institutions, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Education, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here