Shang, H; Anumba, C J; Bouchlaghem, D M; Miles, J C; Cen, M and Taylor, M (2005) An intelligent risk assessment system for distributed construction teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(4), pp. 391-409. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The paper proposes addressing the design and implementation of a web-based risk assessment system that enables remote project team members to assess the risks at the conceptual design stage. Design/methodology/approach - The prototype system is based on a client/server architecture and uses fuzzy logic and web-based technology. A risk assessment scenario is used to demonstrate the operation and benefits of the prototype system. Findings - The research found that the use of a web-based risk assessment system for distributed project team members has major benefits in terms of use of linguistic terms to express risk assessment, ease of communication, ease of maintenance, and greater consistency, among others. Research limitations/implications - There is scope for enhancing the system through the development of a risk management module, improving the user interface and making specific provisions for different project types. Practical implications - The move in industry towards collaborative working practices is supported by systems such as this. Risk assessment is an important area that requires the input of all team members, if evenly distributed. Originality/value - This paper has presented an innovative approach to risk assessment for distributed project teams. It will be of interest to all parties involved in construction projects, particularly those involved in risk assessment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; construction engineering; fuzzy logic; risk assessment; worldwide web |
| Index terms: | risk assessment, construction engineering, risk management, module, implementation, project team, fuzzy logic, working practice, construction team, construction project, methodology, conceptual design, prototype, user interface |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, design practice, management, engineering methods, research methods, production management, financial risk, human-computer interaction, risk assessment, modelling and simulation, contractual arrangements, data science, project delivery |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here