Process models implementation in the construction industry: A literature synthesis

Tzortzopoulos, P; Sexton, M and Cooper, R (2005) Process models implementation in the construction industry: A literature synthesis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 12(5), pp. 470-486. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - Different process models have been developed by academia and industry to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the design and construction activity in response to the need for improving performance. However, the effective and widespread adoption and use of process models have been limited, and the benefits resulting from these endeavours have been ambiguous at best and non-existent at worst. This paper synthesises the key general and construction-specific literature related to process model implementation around a generic model, providing a systematic picture on the current knowledge on implementation. Design/methodology/approach - Secondary data sources were reviewed, criticised and synthesised. The books and academic papers identified focused on the areas of process management in construction and manufacturing, change management and knowledge/technology transfer. Findings - The paper concludes that the body of literature related to process model implementation lacks an integrated focus and cohesion, and the need to appropriately locate and operate the implementation strategy within a visible organisational context is not adequately addressed. Research limitations/implications - The paper review and synthesis are limited to relevant literature within the context of implementation of process models. Practical implications - Gaps in the literature are identified and discussed, and a set of questions proposed to stipulate future research. Originality/value - The paper originality relates to providing a broad, systemic perspective on the complexity of process models implementation, analysing it from different but interrelated conceptual lenses.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change management; construction industry; knowledge transfer; process planning
Index terms: secondary data, efficiency, implementation, construction industry, effectiveness, academia, design and construction, strategy, cohesion, change management, technology transfer, complexity, methodology, process management, knowledge transfer
Subjects: research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, management, structural engineering, research methods, performance management, industry analysis, systems engineering, educational institutions
Topics: Education, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here