Al-Hussein, M; Kumar, J; Sharma, V and Mah, D (2006) A knowledge-based automated development permit approval process in the housing industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(3), pp. 290-306. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The residential construction industry has a major share in Canada's GDP. In spite of huge spending and technical advances in the residential construction sector, the current permit approval process still adheres to traditional manual permit approval process. Consequently, this has contributed to project delays and increased monetary costs to the stakeholders associated with the process. The research presented in this paper seeks to explore key issues related to the current housing development permit approval process. Design/methodology/approach - This paper describes a proposed methodology for the automation of the residential construction development permit approval process. The proposed methodology has been incorporated into a computer system that integrates a knowledge-based expert system (KBES), database management system (DBMS), and computer-aided design (CAD). Various concepts related to the database structures, system architecture, process flow and user interfaces are introduced and described in the context of the development permit approval process. Findings - This paper presents a knowledge-based prototype for the development permit approval process that can be customized as per the needs of various cities. A case study is also presented in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and to illustrate the implementation of the research. Research limitations/implications - The prototype is application-independent and may be implemented anywhere in the AutoCAD environment. The research paves the way for the setting of drafting standards for the residential industry. Originality/value - Prototype provides significant gains in productivity and accuracy over the current practices by minimizing the redundancies involved in the development permit approval process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; construction operations; deductive databases; laws; residential property |
| Index terms: | project delay, housing, system architecture, methodology, expert system, computer aided design, prototype, user interface, accuracy, redundancy, housing development, computer system, approval, management system, implementation, automation, drafting, effectiveness, residential construction, residential property, productivity, database, construction operation, Canada, case study |
| Subjects: | computing systems, computational design, data collection methods, design theory, contractual role, construction type, contractual arrangements, construction operations, technical documentation, modelling and simulation, automation and robotics, Geography, professional development, management, research methods, construction integration, performance management, human-computer interaction, project controls, data management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control, Contract Administration, Human Resources, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here