Arboleda, C A and Abraham, D M (2006) Evaluation of flexibility in capital investments of infrastructure systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(3), pp. 254-274. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a methodology to evaluate the capital investments in infrastructure projects managed by private operators considering uncertainties in the operation and maintenance of the infrastructure components. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology described in this paper is based on two major sources of information: deterioration curves of the infrastructure systems obtained from Markov chain models and the value of flexibility obtained from a real options analysis. Findings - Using this methodology, it is possible to determine whether there is value if project managers adopt flexible strategies in determining capital investments. These strategies refer to the opportunities of postponing, deferring or canceling capital investments required to maintain the operation of the infrastructure systems. Research limitations/implications - The model utilizes Monte Carlo simulation and real options analysis to overcome the complexities associated with the solution of the differential equations that represent the variability of the main factors in the project cash flow. Originality/value - The methodology presented in this paper can be used by public officials, private investors, and asset managers to determine the value of flexibility associated with the strategies required to maintain the operation of infrastructure assets.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data analysis; markov processes; modelling; water industry; water supply and waste systems |
| Index terms: | capital investment, operation and maintenance, data analysis, water supply, deterioration, manager, cash flow, strategy, methodology, complexity, project manager, Markov chain, investor, Monte Carlo simulation, variability, modelling, real options analysis, infrastructure project |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, research methods, maintenance engineering, management, financial management, material degradation and durability, design economy, economic analysis, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, modelling and simulation, practitioner, mathematical modelling, profession |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here